NUTRITION RESEARCH CLAIM CHECKLIST
Yenra | Updated 2026-10-04
Guide: https://yenra.com/wiki/Magnesium_prevents_pancreatic_cancer/

Purpose: Make a claim specific enough to compare with its supporting study.
Copy this text into a note and complete one record per claim. Follow the paper
link; record missing information as unknown. This is a reading aid, not a
diagnostic score, treatment recommendation, or substitute for clinical care.

Claim, quoted or summarized:
Where it appeared and date accessed:
Study title, authors, year, DOI or URL:
Preparation/product, route, and amount (with units):
Population, setting, number enrolled and number analyzed:
Design (animal, observational, randomized, other):
Comparison/control:
Planned primary outcome:
Secondary or exploratory outcome cited in the claim:
Duration and final follow-up:
Effect estimate, units, confidence interval, absolute numbers if reported:
Harms, withdrawals, and missing data:
Funding and disclosed competing interests:
Does the claim match the study population, preparation, and outcome?
What remains uncertain? What do other relevant studies find?
Questions for a clinician, dietitian, or other relevant specialist:

FICTIONAL ARITHMETIC EXAMPLE
Assume comparable groups have five-year event risks of 10/1,000 and 12/1,000.
Absolute difference: 12/1,000 - 10/1,000 = 2/1,000 = 0.2 percentage points.
Relative increase: (12 - 10) / 10 = 20%.
These are invented risks, not pancreatic-cancer estimates. The time period,
denominator, and event must stay attached to the numbers. A hazard ratio
compares event rates over follow-up and is different from this risk example.

CHECK BEFORE ACTING
Keep food intake, concentrated supplements, and clinical interventions distinct.
A study amount is not automatically a recommended personal dose.
Discuss treatment or supplement decisions with the relevant care team.
For animal-feed decisions, check the exact species, formulation basis,
ingredient definition, jurisdiction, and current intended-use conditions.