AUTOMOTIVE REMANUFACTURING TRACEABILITY PILOT
Companion: https://yenra.com/automotive-remanufacturing-rfid/
Planning worksheet, not a standards-conformant EPCIS message or a quality-release procedure. Obtain production, quality and IT approval for the pilot and its acceptance criteria.

PURPOSE AND BOUNDARY
Component family / process start and end / decisions supported:
Existing search, entry and correction effort / measurement period:
Pilot owner / production / quality / IT contacts:

IDENTITY RULES
Part type / individual core / work order / carrier / finished unit:
Which object keeps identity through disassembly:
Replacement component and batch relationships required:
Association start/end when a tray is reused or changed:
Lost tag / uncertain identity / mixed parts review process:

EVENT MAP (repeat for intake, disassembly, cleaning, rebuild, test, packing)
Unit / event time and time zone / read point / process step:
Person or system responsible:
Evidence attached / disposition / allowed next action:
Carrier or package association:
Source capture / correction history / access controls:
Fallback during device or network outage:
Duplicate-read handling and delayed-upload rules:

CAPTURE AND EXPOSURE
Barcode / RFID / combined approach and reason:
Exact tag, attachment, reader, antenna and software versions:
Vendor datasheets and application limits:
Chemical, temperature, duration, abrasion, fluids and metal exposure:
Representative cycles / inspection / survival result:
Orientations, speeds, fixtures, neighboring tags and empty carriers tested:

ACCEPTANCE AND MEASUREMENT
Criteria agreed BEFORE test / decision owners:
Independently observed expected passages N:
Correct unique automatic events C:
Automatic capture C/N x 100:
Passages needing recovery R / recovery share R/N x 100:
False associations / duplicate process events (separate counts):
Reconciliation of each expected passage / unresolved cases:
Recovery labor and final record completeness:
Fictional illustration: N=200, C=194, R=6 gives 97% automatic capture and 3% recovery share. Two separate false events are errors, not additional successes. Manual recovery does not change the initial automatic rate.

DECISION
Identity and quality-release boundaries tested:
Evidence supporting scale-up / failures to resolve:
Hardware, integration, training, maintenance and exception costs:
Useful operational benefit measured:
Next test, owner and date: